SLU-PP-332
Small-molecule pan-ERR (estrogen-related receptor) agonist that mimics exercise-induced metabolic adaptations in preclinical models, not a peptide, but discussed alongside the longevity / metabolic-flexibility peptides.
At a glance
What it is: Small-molecule pan-ERR (estrogen-related receptor) agonist that mimics exercise-induced metabolic adaptations in preclinical models, not a peptide, but discussed alongside the longevity / metabolic-flexibility peptides.
Primary research applications:
- Exercise-mimetic research
- Metabolic dysfunction (preclinical)
- Heart failure and skeletal-muscle endurance models
Editorial summary: SLU-PP-332 is one of the most discussed recent additions to the "exercise mimetic" research conversation. As a synthetic pan-agonist of all three ERR isoforms (α, β, γ), it directly activates the nuclear-receptor pathway that exercise normally drives via PGC-1α, producing exercise-like transcriptomic adaptations in skeletal muscle in mice. Strictly speaking it is a small molecule rather than a peptide, but we cover it because it sits squarely in the longevity / metabolic-flexibility conversation alongside MOTS-c and 5-Amino-1MQ.
- Class / structure
- Synthetic small molecule (not a peptide); pan-ERR agonist
- Half-life
- Not characterized in humans
- First described
- 2023 (Burris lab, published Mol Metab, 2024)
- Regulatory status
- Investigational; preclinical only
What is SLU-PP-332?
SLU-PP-332 is a synthetic small molecule designed as a pan-agonist of all three ERR isoforms (α, β, γ). Unlike previous selective ERR ligands, SLU-PP-332's broad-receptor activation is what produces its distinctive exercise-like transcriptomic profile.
Discovery and development
SLU-PP-332 emerged from the laboratory of Thomas Burris (Saint Louis University, then Scripps Florida and University of Florida), where the group has been characterizing the estrogen-related receptors (ERRα, ERRβ, ERRγ) as nuclear-receptor regulators of mitochondrial biogenesis and energy metabolism. ERRs are "orphan" nuclear receptors with no known endogenous ligand, but they share extensive transcriptional networks with PGC-1α, the master coactivator of exercise-induced mitochondrial adaptation.
The compound came to broader attention with a 2023 publication (followed by a 2024 Molecular Metabolism paper) showing SLU-PP-332 dosed daily in mice produced increased running endurance, weight loss without reduced food intake, improved insulin sensitivity, and skeletal-muscle gene-expression patterns matching those seen with exercise. The framing as an "exercise mimetic" generated significant interest in research-chemical and biohacker communities.
Mechanism of action
ERRs drive expression of genes involved in mitochondrial biogenesis, fatty acid oxidation, and oxidative phosphorylation, the same pathways activated by exercise via the PGC-1α coactivator. Direct ERR agonism by SLU-PP-332 is positioned as a way to drive these adaptations without the muscle contraction and metabolic stress that exercise itself requires.[1]
Mechanistically interesting parallels exist with previous exercise-mimetic candidates, AICAR (AMPK activator) and the now-banned GW501516 (PPARδ agonist), both of which produced striking preclinical results that did not translate cleanly to safe human use. The ERR pathway has a different molecular identity from those programs, but the translational risk pattern is worth keeping in mind.
Pharmacokinetics
Pharmacokinetic data for SLU-PP-332 in humans is not published. Preclinical mouse work has used daily intraperitoneal dosing in the milligram-per-kilogram range. Oral bioavailability appears to be acceptable in animal studies but has not been characterized in humans.
What the research shows
The peer-reviewed literature on SLU-PP-332 is summarized below across two tiers: human research (the highest standard), and preclinical / emerging research (animal models and early-stage human work).
Claims and the evidence behind them
This table summarizes commonly discussed claims and how the published evidence weighs in. The aim is clarity, supported claims, claims that look promising but need more data, and claims that outrun the science.
| Claim | What the evidence shows | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| Mimics exercise-induced transcriptomic profile in mouse skeletal muscle | Billon 2024 | Supported |
| Improves running capacity in mice | Billon 2024 | Supported |
| Will replace exercise as a longevity intervention in humans | No human evidence; significant translational risk | Unsupported |
| Is safe for chronic human use | No human safety data | Uncertain |
Reported user experiences
How the research describes administration
Animal studies have used daily intraperitoneal injection in the mg/kg range. There is no clinical protocol for human use; the compound is not a clinical pharmaceutical product.
Editorial note
Administration details above describe how the peptide is given in published studies. We summarize this for educational completeness; these descriptions are not protocols, dosing recommendations, or instructions for personal use. Decisions about treatment require an appropriately licensed clinician.
Safety considerations and open questions
The takeaway
SLU-PP-332 is one of the most exciting recent preclinical findings in metabolic / exercise-mimetic biology, the rodent data is striking, the mechanism is mechanistically novel, and the framing has captured significant attention in longevity and performance circles. Practically speaking, for human readers is: this is mouse data. The translational distance from "improves running capacity in mice" to "viable longevity therapeutic in humans" is the same distance that has defeated many earlier exercise-mimetic candidates. Worth tracking as a research direction; not yet supported as a clinical or self-experimentation strategy.
Frequently asked questions
Is SLU-PP-332 a peptide?
No. It is a synthetic small molecule. We cover it because it sits in the same longevity / metabolic-flexibility conversation as peptides like MOTS-c, and is increasingly discussed in research-chemical communities alongside them.
Is SLU-PP-332 safe to use?
It has no published human safety data. The compound is investigational and has been tested only in mice. Use as a research chemical in humans is outside any clinical-evidence framework.
Will SLU-PP-332 replace exercise?
The mouse data shows exercise-like transcriptomic adaptations, but exercise produces benefits beyond muscle gene expression, cardiovascular, neurological, psychological, metabolic. The framing of any candidate as an "exercise replacement" outpaces the evidence by a wide margin.
How does SLU-PP-332 differ from MOTS-c?
Different molecular class entirely. SLU-PP-332 is a small-molecule nuclear-receptor agonist; MOTS-c is a peptide encoded in mitochondrial DNA. Both are discussed in metabolic / longevity contexts, but they act through different mechanisms.
References
- Hong EJ, Levasseur MP, Dufour CR, Perry MC, Giguère V. Loss of estrogen-related receptor alpha promotes hepatocellular carcinogenesis. Hepatology. 2013;58(2):605-616. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23485422/
- Billon C, Sitaula S, Banerjee S, et al. Synthetic ERRα/β/γ agonist induces an ERR pan-agonist exercise-like transcriptomic response in muscle and improves metabolic phenotypes. Mol Metab. 2024;79:101852. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38092245/