Metabolic & Weight Loss (GLP-1 and Related)

MariTide / Maridebart cafraglutide (AMG 133)

Amgen's investigational AMG 133 / maridebart cafraglutide — GLP-1 receptor agonist conjugated to a GIP receptor antagonist, the deliberate inversion of tirzepatide's dual-agonist concept, dosed monthly.

Promising (Phase 3 in progress 2026)

At a glance

What it is: Amgen's investigational AMG 133 / maridebart cafraglutide — GLP-1 receptor agonist conjugated to a GIP receptor antagonist, the deliberate inversion of tirzepatide's dual-agonist concept, dosed monthly..

Primary research applications:

  • Obesity — Phase 3 ongoing
  • Type 2 diabetes — Phase 3 planned
  • Once-monthly dosing format for sustained weight loss

Editorial summary: MariTide (also written as Maridebart cafraglutide, formerly AMG 133) is the most mechanistically distinctive molecule in the next-generation incretin class. By combining GLP-1 receptor agonism with GIP receptor ANTAGONISM (the opposite of tirzepatide's GIP agonism), Amgen has bet that GIP antagonism — not agonism — drives the additive weight loss in dual-receptor strategies. Phase 2 reported ~21% weight loss at 12 months; Phase 3 (MARITIDE-1) is enrolling 2025-2026. The monthly subcutaneous dosing format is a major differentiator from weekly GLP-1s — and is the reason MariTide is one of the most-discussed Phase 3 candidates in obesity pharmacology going into 2027.

Class / structure
Antibody-peptide conjugate: anti-GIPR monoclonal antibody linked to two GLP-1 analog peptides
Half-life
Long; supports monthly subcutaneous dosing
First described
2010s (Amgen)
Regulatory status
Investigational — Phase 3

What is MariTide?

MariTide is an investigational antibody-peptide conjugate. The antibody portion antagonizes the GIP receptor; the peptide portion agonizes the GLP-1 receptor. The combination is mechanistically distinctive in the GLP-1 / GIP space — opposite in direction from tirzepatide's dual GIP/GLP-1 agonism.

Discovery and development

MariTide originated from Amgen's research into the role of GIP receptor signaling in body weight regulation — work that produced the surprising finding that GIP receptor antagonism, rather than agonism, may be what drives part of the additive weight loss seen in dual-receptor strategies. The molecule was developed as a peptibody / antibody-peptide conjugate combining anti-GIPR monoclonal antibody activity with GLP-1 receptor agonism.

Phase 1 first-in-human results published in Nature Metabolism in 2024 established the proof-of-concept; Phase 2 data has supported Phase 3 advancement.

Mechanism of action

GLP-1 receptor agonism contributes the standard incretin appetite suppression and glycemic control. GIP receptor antagonism — the surprising arm — has been associated in preclinical work with reduced body weight via mechanisms including effects on adipose tissue, central appetite signaling, and possibly nausea modulation. The Amgen team's hypothesis is that GIP antagonism explains a meaningful portion of the additive weight loss attributed to GIP/GLP-1 modulation, and that doing it via antagonism rather than agonism produces a cleaner profile.[1]

Pharmacokinetics

The antibody backbone supports a long half-life and once-monthly subcutaneous administration — a significant differentiation from weekly peptide GLP-1s. Steady state is approached over multiple monthly doses.

What the research shows

The peer-reviewed literature on MariTide is summarized below across two tiers: human research (the highest standard), and preclinical / emerging research (animal models and early-stage human work).

Claims and the evidence behind them

This table summarizes commonly discussed claims and how the published evidence weighs in. The aim is clarity — supported claims, claims that look promising but need more data, and claims that outrun the science.

ClaimWhat the evidence showsVerdict
Produces ~21% weight loss in Phase 2 obesityAmgen Phase 2 readoutPromising
Monthly dosing supports better adherence than weekly optionsMechanistically supported by half-lifePlausible
GIP antagonism, not agonism, drives the additive weight loss in dual receptor strategiesMechanistic hypothesis with strong preclinical support; clinical comparison still being characterizedPromising
Will displace tirzepatide and retatrutideSpeculative — depends on Phase 3 head-to-head and accessUncertain

Reported user experiences

How the research describes administration

Phase 2/3 trial protocols use monthly subcutaneous injection. As an investigational drug, MariTide is available only through trial enrollment.

Editorial note

Administration details above describe how the peptide is given in published studies. We summarize this for educational completeness — these descriptions are not protocols, dosing recommendations, or instructions for personal use. Decisions about treatment require an appropriately licensed clinician.

Safety considerations and open questions

The takeaway

MariTide is one of the most intellectually interesting molecules in late-stage metabolic development. The mechanistic premise — that GIP antagonism rather than agonism is the right way to combine with GLP-1 — is a striking inversion of what the field assumed before tirzepatide was approved. Combined with a monthly dosing format that no other late-stage GLP-1 candidate offers, MariTide represents a credible alternative path to next-generation obesity care.

What to watch: The Phase 3 MARITIDE-1 trial readout (expected 2027) is the gating event — will determine whether the ~21% Phase 2 weight loss replicates at scale and whether the GIP-antagonism hypothesis holds against larger populations. The T2D Phase 3 program (MARITIDE-2) extends the story into diabetes. If MariTide reaches approval at the Phase 2 efficacy level, it would compete with tirzepatide at the dosing-convenience axis (monthly vs weekly) — a substantial market advantage even at comparable efficacy.

For the broader pipeline view, see our MariTide AMG 133 explainer article and the broader emerging-drug coverage in our Best Peptides for Weight Loss 2026 ranking. For comparisons across the modern GLP-1 class (Semaglutide → Tirzepatide → Retatrutide → MariTide → CagriSema), see our 3-way comparison article. The other Phase 3 GLP-1-class candidates worth tracking alongside MariTide are Retatrutide (triple agonist), CagriSema (semaglutide + amylin), Survodutide (GLP-1/glucagon dual), and the emerging HU6 controlled mitochondrial uncoupler that represents a fundamentally different mechanism class.

Frequently asked questions

Is MariTide a peptide?

It is an antibody-peptide conjugate — an anti-GIPR monoclonal antibody covalently linked to two GLP-1 analog peptide arms. The peptide GLP-1 component is functionally part of the GLP-1 class; the antibody GIPR antagonist component is a distinct biologic modality. See Are GLP-1 medications peptides? for how MariTide sits in the broader class and the MariTide explainer for the full story.

How does monthly dosing work?

The antibody backbone gives MariTide a much longer half-life than weekly peptide GLP-1s. Phase 2/3 protocols administer the drug subcutaneously once a month, with steady-state pharmacology approached over multiple monthly doses.

Why is GIP antagonism — not agonism — being combined with GLP-1?

The historical assumption was that GIP agonism in tirzepatide drives the additive weight loss vs GLP-1 alone. Amgen's preclinical work suggested that GIP antagonism may actually be doing more of that work than agonism — a hypothesis MariTide is now testing in humans.

References

  1. Killion EA, et al. Anti-obesity effects of GIPR antagonists alone and in combination with GLP-1R agonists. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10(472):eaat3392. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30567927/
  2. Véniant MM, et al. A GIPR antagonist conjugated to GLP-1 analogues promotes weight loss with improved metabolic parameters. Nat Metab. 2024;6:290-303. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38336924/